Julian Sanchez (via Yglesias)
We’re at most a few years off from broad adoption of augmented reality applications
in widely-used smartphones, which will have all of us radiating reams
of data to anyone in our physical proximity who actually cares. Your
Facebook profile will dog you like one of those floating Sims icons.
You won’t just know what the girl sitting across the coffee shop is
blasting on her iPod, you’ll be able to listen in. All the tech is
actually here already, if not in quite the fancy form it’s implemented
at the link above. All it would take is for someone to integrate the
location-sensitive functions of an app like Loopt into the apps for
Facebook or Last.fm, and you’ve got a point-and-profile system. The
real question is whether people actually want to signal that much in the physical context.
Yglesias responds:
Of course the answer to Julian’s worry here would presumably be that
you could use some kind of setting to signal implicitly or explicitly
that you’re not interested in strangers talking to you. And the same
feature could transform the dating scene; people not interested in
amorous advances could broadcast this fact to the audiences, while
those who are interested could also broadcast that. This, in turn,
could change the dynamics at places like museums that aren’t customary
places to meet people.
You know what I don't need? An iPhone app that alerts me to the fact that every dude within a city block is "available."
I bet your standard-issue 6.5+ woman in LA doesn't need it either.
And forget about gay dudes, I think it's just understood.
While the appeal of point-and-click profiling appeals to my creepy voyeuristic sensibilities, I don't see it gaining much popularity outside the realm of other creepy voyeurs.
Say you have a function on your iPhone that makes you "discoverable" to others within range (like a little randy bluetooth), you're just sitting there in Coffee Bean learing at the handful of (moslty male) discoverables in the join.
I'll pass.