Conservative blogger Dan Rhiel, who may or may not be a a gay child predator, says that Bill Sparkman, the slain census worker, may have been a gay child predator.
But he also may not have been.
Why Dan finds a bound-and-gagged man to be "seriously sexual" is between him and his therapist. As to why a meth-head would take the time to write "fed" on Sparkman's chest, I can't be certain.
For that matter, why would a meth-head disassemble and reassemble their toaster? Why would they clean their oil-filter with a q-tip? Why would the government plant microscopic GPS aphids in their cheeks?
The point is, once you start throwing "whys" at meth-related conduct, you fall down a slippery, paranoid, (if tidy) slope.
Rhiel continues
Bolding mine. Rhiel concedes he doesn't know a thing about the story, but neither does anyone else. That said, why not make the leap to gay sex? With children?
I bet it does.
What a waste.
She didn't say she had been advised not to speculate. Being in Florida she has nothing to fear from Kentucky locals, so why the secrecy? Add that to the somewhat mysterious way this case is being revealed by authorities and whatever is behind it, I wouldn't be surprised if there's another surprise in store here.
And for Dan Rhiel, the only conceivable surprise would be of the sex-with-children variety.
This last part is just...bizarre...
Until we know that Sparkman was not a child-predator, we have to assume that he may have been, because we don't know that he isn't.
Comments